2026
  編者按：
  金秋赴約，方案論道。從命題啟思到圖紙落定，自方案征集啟幕，歷經百余日的創作與積淀，由國際建筑師協會（UIA）主辦，天津大學建筑學院、內蒙古工業大學建筑學院、《城市環境設計》（UED）雜志社聯合主辦，上海霍普建筑設計事務所股份有限公司獨家冠名的“UIA-霍普杯2026國際大學生建筑設計競賽”評審會于2026年10月24日在內蒙古工業大學圓滿收官！
  評審會現場照片
  本屆UIA-霍普杯由考克斯建筑事務所創始合伙人、澳大利亞榮譽官佐勛章獲得者菲利普?考克斯（Philip Cox）出任評審主席，并為本屆賽事擬定主題：何以棲居——城市、郊區、鄉村。賽事一經啟動，便吸引了全球千余組青年學子遞交方案。
  組委會特邀17位海內外知名建筑師、建筑教育家組成評審團，經過多輪嚴謹評圖、深度研討與思想交鋒，最終評選出69組優勝作品：一等獎1組，二等獎5組，三等獎12組，優秀獎13組，入圍獎35組，另設AI獎3組。萬眾期待的評審結果現已就位，接下來，一同揭曉UIA-霍普杯2026國際大學生建筑設計競賽完整獲獎名單！
  AWARDS ANNOUNCED
  獎項揭曉
  一等獎
  The First Prize
  一等獎獲獎名單
  經過激烈角逐，最終由來自天津大學的劉奕辰、劉偌祎、程重黎、牟子涵，以作品《重新定義管道:從城市基礎設施到社區共享空間》摘得本屆UIA-霍普杯2026國際大學生建筑設計競賽桂冠！
  After fierce competition,the team consisting of Liu Yichen,Liu Ruoyi,Cheng Zhongli and Mu Zihan from Tianjin University won the championship of the UIA-Hyp Cup 2026 International Student Competition in Architectural Design with their work REPIPE ITSELF.
  一等獎作品《重新定義管道:從城市基礎設施到社區共享空間》
  二等獎
  The Second Prize
  二等獎獲獎名單
  二等獎作品《與物為春》
  二等獎作品《仿佛若有光——地上與地下的第三種棲居》
  二等獎作品《橋上有戲》
  二等獎作品《漂泊的努塔——致以風逐草棲的人們》
  二等獎作品《上面尖尖下面深深》
  三等獎
  The Third Prize
  三等獎獲獎名單
  優秀獎與入圍獎
  The Honorable Mentions and Finalist
  優秀獎獲獎名單
  入圍獎獲獎名單
  AI獎
  AI Award
  ▲AI獎名單
  UIA-霍普杯2026國際大學生建筑設計競賽獲獎名單已進入公示階段，公示期為七個工作日。如對公示內容有任何異議，請在公示期內及時與2026年UIA-霍普杯組委會取得聯系。
  （聯系方式：聯系郵箱uedmedia 163.com；聯系人：袁老師；聯系電話：17640248261）
  The list of winners of the UIA-Hope Cup 2026 International Student Architectural Design Competition is now open for public announcement for seven working days.Should you have any objections to the published information,please contact the Organizing Committee of the 2026 UIA-Hope Cup within the announcement period.
  (Contact Information:Email:uedmedia 163.com;Contact:Ms.Yuan;Tel:17640248261)
  REVIEW MEETING
  評審現場直擊
  評審會現場
  現場匯報
  COMPETITION REVIEW
  競賽回顧
  競賽主題
  Competition Theme
  何以棲居——城市、郊區與鄉村
  Villagers urban,suburban,rural
  題目解析
  Theme Interpretation
  隨著全球多數地區人口從鄉村向城市遷移，許多城市已發展為容納2500萬人口乃至更多的巨型都市。其中部分城市已然突破傳統城市的概念界限，其自身的身份特征已難以被清晰辨識。我們固然能夠理解中央商務區（CBD）的獨特性與視覺辨識度，然而，“社區”與“社會單元”本身的意義卻隨之受到質疑。它們是否依然存在？我們棲居之所的場所感何在？承載我們存在的場所精神又在何處？
  With rural drift to the cities happening in most places of the world many of these have become megalopolises holding up to 25 million people and some more which defy the concept of city as we traditionally know it having identity that can be comprehended.We can understand the concepts of central business districts CBD of having some distinctiveness and visual realisation however the whole question of community and social unit comes into question.Does it exist anymore,where is the sense of place of living,the genius loci of our being.
  隨著高層住宅不斷提高城市密度，我們共事、交往與共居的社會單元，連同我們的生活環境，也因此面臨重新審視。城市面貌日趨同質化，身份認同不斷流失，人與人之間的社會交往與互動空間被大幅壓縮。隨著城市生活成本居高不下且就業前景充滿不確定性，鄉村人口持續涌入城市的發展模式正受到質疑。與此同時，人們對清潔空氣、能源資源等環境問題的關注日益增加，使得小型社區與“村落”單元，正被視作切實可行的替代發展模式，重新進入大眾視野。
  The social unit of who we work with,socialise,live with,the environment in which we live is under question as we increase the densities of our cities through high rise residential buildings creating a spreading sameness a loss of identity that affords little opportunity for social;inter reactive process to take place.The rural drift to the cities continuing is questioned as affordability in cities and work opportunity is uncertain,and coupled with environmental concerns such clean air,energy resources,smaller communities or village units are being examined as viable alternatives.
  我們正處于建立自給自足型可持續社區的臨界點——這些社區能通過太陽能等方式自行發電、收集水源、管理廢棄物、回收利用舊物，并采用零碳建材延續在地建筑傳統。無論是城市還是鄉村，已有眾多社區實現了農產品自給。信息技術與人工智能正在塑造一個全新的社會形態：遠程辦公模式日趨成熟，不再受限于特定地點或傳統商業辦公樓的束縛。工廠與生產場所全面邁向自動化、機械化。這種變革賦予人們選擇居住環境更大的自由——無論是偏愛擁有文化資源的城市、渴望接觸廣闊天地的郊區，還是追求與自然土地融為一體的鄉村生活。
  We are on the threshold of establishing self-sufficient sustainable communities that can produce their own power through solar and other means,collect their own water,manage their waste products,recycle material of the past,build in the vernacular tradition using materials that have zero carbon impact.There are many examples of communities both urban and rural growing their own produce.IT and AI are producing a different society where work can operate remotely and does not need to be confined to place or a commercial office as we know it.Factories and places of manufacture are increasingly robotic and mechanised.This allows a greater freedom for choice of habitat,whether the preference is in the city with its cultural advantages,suburbia that allows contact with a broader landscape or rural that is integrated with the earth itself.
  無論是城市、郊區還是鄉村，所有這些居住選擇都需要“村落”理念的支撐——即人與人往來互動，秉持共同的價值觀，共享學校、商業街區、市集、社區集會等空間，為音樂、美術等文化活動提供生長土壤。最重要的是，“村落”的建筑應以在地化的方式，真實體現其居民的生活與文化特征。關于社交缺失、心理健康問題的討論層出不窮，其背后往往是“村落”生活的消亡。建筑所承載的“歸屬感”至關重要，建筑設計更需從生態、社會雙重維度回應人們的生活，維系人的身份認同與歸屬感。
  Each of these opportunities of living require the concept of village,where a collection of people have interface with each other and share common values,sharing such things as schools,retail areas and market,community gatherings and meeting halls,where cultural events such as music and art can flourish,and most importantly where the architecture of the village expresses the people themselves in a vernacular way.There is so much discussion of loss of socialisation,mental health issues that have resulted from the loss of village life.The sense of belonging to a place represented by its architecture is important and how that architecture helps in the lives of the people in all ways,environmentally and socially,the sense of identity and belonging.
  將被動式節能技術融入當代建筑設計，是人類可持續存續的關鍵。建筑設計應有機融入這些技術，而非將其生硬、刻意地附加于建筑之上。
  The inclusion of passive energy technologies into the architecture of our time is important for our survival and how architecture can absorb those technologies without treating them as uncomfortable attachments.
  本次設計議題旨在從三種居住方式中擇取其一，展示如何營造具有現實意義的社區：選擇城市模式，可依托廢棄工業區更新改造，或重構高密度城區，賦予其新的價值；選擇郊區模式，應展現社區的凝聚力，而非無序蔓延，并探索如何規劃一個具有凝聚力的社區；選擇鄉村模式，則可呈現融合可持續理念并與景觀環境相協調的新建筑，體現真正的地方性價值與身份認同。
  The problem will be to select one of the three ways of living and to demonstrate how communities can be created that have relevance.For those choosing urban,a disused industrial area can be chosen or the reorganisation of a higher dense area of the city that can be redesigned to provide new values.Suburban communities should demonstrate cohesion,not sprawl and how to plan a cohesive community whilst those choosing rural can demonstrate the new architecture of sustainability and landscape integration representing true vernacular values and identity.
  題目解析由建筑大師菲利普·考克斯提供
  獎項設置
  Award Categories
  一等獎1組，
  獲獎證書+獎金80,000元人民幣（含稅）；
  二等獎5組，
  獲獎證書+獎金各15,000元人民幣（含稅）；
  三等獎12組，
  獲獎證書+獎金各8,000元人民幣（含稅）；
  AI獎3組，
  獲獎證書+獎金各1萬元人民幣（含稅）；
  優秀獎若干名，頒發獲獎證書;
  優秀指導教師獎若干名，頒發獲獎證書。
  1st Prize(1 team):
  Certificate and 80,000 RMB(before tax);
  2nd Prize(5 teams):
  Certificate and 15,000 RMB(before tax);
  3rd Prize(12 teams):
  Certificate and 8,000 RMB(before tax);
  AI Award(3 teams):
  Certificates and 10,000 RMB(before tax);
  Honorable Mentions(several teams):Certificate;
  Advisors of prize-winning projects will also be awarded with certificates.
  撰文|2026霍普杯組委會

  編輯|2026霍普杯組委會、《城市環境設計》（UED)雜志新媒體部

作品展示詳見（復制以下鏈接進瀏覽器查看）：

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/MI8oW9Ujmkr25R3hxv8beA